To the Readers,
Storrs Olson’s letter to the Nat’l Geographic has now been made a page available in the side bar (The Smithsonian rebukes the Nat’l Geographic)
A number of atheistic and evolutionary journals have lately been throwing around a lot of ink in defense of, “scientific consensus”, or in rebuttal of creation or design orientated critiques of the way evolutionary apologists use consensus to try and shut down the creation/evolutionary debate. What is the truth about scientific consensus and what has been its effect on science and research historically?
The post “Scientific Consensus” has been made into a page you can find in the sidebar for the readers convenience and accessibility, be sure to check it out.
Thank you. (P.S. Blog subcriptions are now available in the sidebar)