The Democratic View of the Constitution turns it into a Criminally Useful Document

Two times a sitting president (Barack Obama) abused the purpose of federal agencies, and violated their non-partisan obligation, to manipulate a presidential election. In 2012 he pulled it off, in 2016, he failed. But…why should anyone who interprets the constitution from an evolutionary atheist view care? Which is why the democrats don’t care. Atheism and Darwinism provide no inalienable rights or universal morals; except; only the strong (or sneakiest) will survive.

“House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes also released a statement Saturday, reiterating his position that the FBI spied on an American citizen through the use of an opposing party’s “political dirt” and that “the FISA court was misled about Mr. Page’s past interactions with the FBI.”
Nunes’ statement also said, “It defies belief that the Department of Justice and FBI failed to provide information to a secret court that they had provided to an open federal court regarding their past interactions with Mr. Page.” Daily Caller

Advertisements
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Chapter Two;  What Does Paul mean by Apostasy in 2nd Thessalonians? Excerpt from the Apostasia

Chapter Two

 What Does Paul mean by Apostasy in 2nd Thessalonians?

 How would we define apostasy from what Paul tells us in the context of his second letter to the Thessalonians? As the concordances we looked at in the previous chapter indicate, the apostasy is a time of falling away, of a great deflection, a divorce from the truth of God “Once and for all delivered to the saints” Jude 3.

The Church Age has existed for over two thousand years now, and its history has for the most part been well documented by hundreds of historians and leaders from days’ past. That the church has gone through many periods of revival and devival, apostasies, as well as periods of stagnation is well known. However, there is a tendency with some people to see the last days in every event and every period of history and we want to avoid reading too much into any one circumstance or set of circumstances.

And yet on the other hand there is an opposite tendency on the part of many others to adopt an “Ever since our fathers died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation” attitude towards church history in general and our present period. On an extremely short scale, the last seventy years, I think the evangelical church has gone from perhaps an over emphasis on the Lord’s imminent return since the re-establishment of the Jewish people in Israel, to an attitude among many of the Christian young people today of; “everything continues as it has since the beginning of creation,’ 2 Peter 3:4. The context of Second Peter is that just such a lax attitude towards the second coming would dominate before His return. However, because the time scale is so short I am not offering that as one of the evidences of our being in the Apostasia.

The point needs to be made that all eras and periods of church history have not been the same.  Paul the Apostle as well as the Apostle Peter definitely earmarked a certain period of history that would be marked by an increasingly apostate church, a church that would not only fail to have much effect on the surrounding culture, but would instead conform itself to meet the standards of an alarmingly aggressive apostate and pagan society.

This period of apostasy wouldn’t apply so much to the areas of the world where the gospel is still spreading, places where there either never was or hasn’t been a real church presence for a long period of time. For this reason, China, India and many parts of Africa would not have to be included in a survey of apostasy in the church. The term “apostasy” is a falling away, a turning away from something once widely held and taught.

Historically, many would call the turning away from biblical truth in the beginning of the medieval ages a type of apostasy and they would be accurate. However, the areas of the world which have been dominated by the church and the Christian faith for centuries, particularly the European nations and their colonies did go through a reformation which centered the church back on the Scriptures again. The Catholic Church also participated in the reform in many ways, and both continued to have a strong influence on their respective societies for centuries afterwards.

Basic truths and ethical mores remained the same for over a millennium, whether you were a catholic or protestant, a peasant or of the nobility. While the Catholic might have placed the pope and the catholic hierarchy over the Word of God and its interpretation, no one doubted that the Bible was indeed, the word of God. No one questioned its authenticity or authority, even though they may have argued over its interpretation. Certain fundamental beliefs were held to be true by all, catholic or protestant.

 By fundamentals I simply mean an English protestant would have shared many of the fundamental truths of the faith that any Cape Breton catholic would have believed 500 years ago. The Scriptures were the authoritative words of God and our guide for life and religion. The universe was created ex-nihilo by a triune God; Jesus Christ was God and man, both would have accepted an historical 6 day creation; Adam made from dust, Eve from his side; they would have understood an initially good creation marred by a literal fall and curse, meaning no death before sin; they would have shared a common faith in a physical death and resurrection and ultimate return of the Jewish Messiah; a physical heaven for the saved and physical and eternal hell for the lost. All these basic beliefs were held in common throughout most of Christendom, not just for a few decades, but for centuries.

Differences of emphasis, teaching, church structure, and doctrine were wide spread, but for the most part the basics of the historical Christian faith were firmly held. For almost two thousand years, this was the case.

Fundamental beliefs about morality also pervaded throughout Christendom. Divorce was almost unheard of, sex before marriage was considered the sin of fornication, infanticide and pre-natal infanticide were made illegal everywhere, whether you lived in a catholic or protestant region of the world. Modesty was held to be the standard that both men and women should follow, not something to be mocked or looked down upon. Open displays of sexuality were not condoned nor considered healthy for society in general. Sexually transmitted diseases were not a serious problem for centuries. Homosexual behavior was largely kept out of view and there were no major plagues associated with either homosexual or heterosexual promiscuity.

However, Paul wrote of a time when these things would no longer be so. A time when the Church and Christian society would “fall away” from these standards and truths. The verses in context of Second Thessalonians read;

“Now we request you, brethren, with regard to the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together to Him, that you not be quickly shaken from your composure or be disturbed either by a spirit or a message or a letter as if from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come. Let no one in any way deceive you, for it will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, displaying himself as being God.  Do you not remember that while I was still with you, I was telling you these things?  And you know what restrains him now, so that in his time he will be revealed. For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now restrains will do so until he is taken out of the way. Then that lawless one will be revealed whom the Lord will slay with the breath of His mouth and bring to an end by the appearance of His coming; that is, the one whose coming is in accord with the activity of Satan, with all power and signs and false wonders, and with all the deception of wickedness for those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth so as to be saved. For this reason God will send upon them a deluding influence so that they will believe what is false, in order that they all may be judged who did not believe the truth, but took pleasure in wickedness.”

 One thing is certain as far as I am concerned, the “man of lawlessness” has not been revealed and he is of key importance in these scriptures. None the less, as Paul said, even in his day the mystery of lawlessness was working, and he clearly indicates a falling away would come and that at that time Christian society would reach a point where they preferred to believe a lie, over the truth. Because of this total disregard for even the concept of truth, God would then send them a delusion.

Romans chapter one talks of the general tendency of mankind to apostasy in a very clear and definable manner. Starting at verse 18 and continuing through verse 32, Paul writes;

“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened.  Professing to be wise, they became fools and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man–and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.  Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.”

Man has an affinity for turning his worship towards the created earth and away from the earth’s Creator. He goes on to say that in such times of apostasy God would allow men and women to fall away from his truths because they preferred to believe a lie, and that homosexual behavior would increase among them, in both sexes. God allows this because;

“And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting;”

 “For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.”

 Many today, including professing Christians, claim they don’t find the bible a meaningful source of connection to the real world. Yet few could deny that an unprecedented outbreak of sexual promiscuity exploded on the scene in both Europe and America following the 1960’s. With its emphasis on free sex without boundaries and the increasingly enforced acceptance of homosexual behavior, it does seem to resemble Paul’s description of apostasy found in Romans chapter one. Nor does the AID’s epidemic seem wholly incongruous with the “receiving the penalty within themselves of the error that was due,” found in the first chapter of Romans.  AID’s was not the only sexually transmitted disease arriving on the scene by any means with Herpes and a couple of dozen other viruses becoming widespread at that time.

So, I think most would be willing to admit that the Christian societies of the old world at least appear to have entered into a time of apostasy. But are there any symptoms or evidences that we may be in “the” Apostasy, the period of time that sets the stage for the revealing of the anti-Christ and the return of the Lord that Paul wrote about in Second Thessalonians?

I think there are some unique and compelling evidences and will list some of them in the next chapter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Quote of the Week; Noah Webster

Noah Webster; revolutionary war soldier, judge, educator, called “the school master to America”

“The religion which has introduced civil liberty is the religion of Christ and His apostles… This is genuine Christianity and to this we owe our free constitutions of government”
Noah Webster, History of the United States (New Haven: Durrie and Peck, 1832), p. 300

This was no wild conjecture; Protestant Christianity put everyone; Pope and Pastor, Prince and King, under the authority of scripture; nobody was above the word of God. This brought about a new sense of equality from tenant farmer to Duke, from woodcutter to legislator; and it brought about a common ground for understanding right and wrong. That was one of the dynamics behind the Magna Carta; and when the Puritans overthrew the King of England to protect Parliament and religious liberty; Oliver Cromwell deliberately applied his and their belief that, as is written on his gravestone; Christ not man, is King. The only thing that atheism can bring about is frightened masses and all powerful governments. But, on the grounds of a scientific idea so poor it cannot even qualify as a theory, we’ve thrown away our freedoms hard won from our Christian heritage for a pile of academic gobshakes, called atheism. Surely fallen man is running from God.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Quote of the Week

“Isn’t it strange when a culture outlaws leg-hold traps but legalizes the sale of baby parts?”
Would-be Trapper

One important point I want to make on this post; When I condemn the practice of abortion, I am in no way condemning the women who have been coerced into abortion or talked themselves into the act; how could I? How could I condemn them for having been born into a culture where sex is cheap and has no connection to the responsibility of marriage, or child rearing? Where the teaching of the atheist creation story thru out the government school systems has justified the cheapening of human life- to less than the level of mere animals? Just like the southern democrats that bought and bred black slaves on their plantations, and were born into a slave keeping society that reduced the humanity of the blacks to subhuman, and thus had inoculated themselves to the trade. But as the declaration of independence clearly states; all human beings have inalienable rights that exist outside of human government- and all humans are stamped with God’s image. Which is why Moses first recognized the humanity of slaves and why the Christian nations were the first to abolish the practice, along with abortion, starting as far back as 800 AD in Europe. It would be sheer hypocrisy for someone living in an abortion inoculated society to condemn someone born into a slave-keeping society. But I condemn the act of abortion for what it is. An attack on human life; an attack on the most innocent and defenseless of humans; an attack on the very morals this nation was founded on. Have a good day

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Did Obama as president imply that the 1857 SCOTUS law supporting slavery was valid?

Better start re-erecting those downed Robert E. Lee statues! According to then pres. Barack Obama, the argument of privacy used to support slavery in the 1857 supreme court Dred Scot decision, was valid!

As President, Obama, the “constitutional lawyer” reaffirmed the women’s constitutional right to…privacy?
Ummm, that is, the imagined constitutional right to KILL her baby.
In a speech to Planned Parenthood he said, ” “Forty years after the Supreme Court affirmed a woman’s constitutional right to privacy, including the right to choose, we shouldn’t have to remind people that when it comes to a woman’s health, no politician should get to decide what’s best for you,”
Apparently he is referring to the Roe vs Wade argument quoted here;
“A slave is the property of the master and the Constitution has “provided for the protection of private property against the encroachments of the Government.” Dred Scott case of 1857
Oh! I’m sorry! That’s the supreme court argument using the right of privacy to support keeping slaves! so embarrassing, sorry! Here is the Roe vs Wade argument;
Roe vs. Wade decreed;
“This right of privacy… is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.” (terminate her pregnancy, as in, KILL her baby) 1973
So actually, the SCOTUS law supporting slavery, was valid? Our first black president, a self confessed constitutional lawyer, apparently thinks so…apparently both the slave and baby, though genuine human beings, have no God given rights, since both have been deemed, “private property”, thus their possesors are protected by the right to privacy.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Quote of the Week

The Northwest Ordinance, July 13, 1787
Article III.
“Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged. The utmost good faith shall always be observed towards the Indians; their lands and property shall never be taken from them without their consent; and, in their property, rights, and liberty, they shall never be invaded or disturbed, unless in just and lawful wars authorized by Congress; but laws founded in justice and humanity, shall from time to time be made for preventing wrongs being done to them, and for preserving peace and friendship with them.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What About that Horrid White Race?

Why does the left keep attacking the Caucasian race, so that even the “white people” are taught to feel ashamed or guilty of being white? (I’m talking in racist terms because that’s what it seems to be all about these days) So, is the white race the worst, and most evil? Well, what Barack Obama in his book, and college campuses keep using as proof of this horridness, is that we colonized the majority of the world. But did we colonize the world because we were so evil, or because we had the technology?

No offense but if African or Indian canoes could have crossed the Atlantic or cruised up north from Africa, they would have. But even if they could have, if they had landed in Western European shores any time after the 13th century, they would have been blown out the water by cannon, musket and crossbow fire. Technology had exploded in Europe, they were light years ahead of the rest of the world.

Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not trying to defend the white race, that’s not my tact here. To me it’s so unmanly and unproductive to whine about how hard your ethnic group has had it, no matter how popular that is today, (if anyone deserves an exception, it would have to be the Jewish) and really, ungodly because you’re blaming Providence.

But the Democratic party has chosen atheism, an unrealistic world view, to base all their premises. God is not allowed into political thought because that would be a violation of the left’s interpretation of the establishment clause. But where did these horrible Europeans get their technology? Was it their skin color? Nope. Just like the Jewish people were light years ahead of all other cultures, in their sanitation, and faith in only one god, so the western Europeans on accepting the Jewish God, exploded ahead of other nations in technology.

Now this is all very un-leftwing, but this is exactly why the existing Democratic party is attacking the founders of our nation, and it’s constitution. Our constitution is not an atheist or socialist based document. Our founders pointed back to God and said true, inalienable rights come from him only and governments are formed for the express purpose of defending those rights.

The left screams against slavery but slavery was said to be wrong by Abraham Lincoln and the founders because it violated those inalienable rights. Just like abortion, which the modern Democratic party defends with a vengeance. The democratic party doesn’t want to compete with God , so they have been trying for 60 years to remove even the mention of him from the schools and political scene, and quite successfully. They’ll push racial division, class warfare, gender warfare, anything to keep your eyes off the God given basis of the Constitution, and the God behind it. They want the government to be god and the construer of all rights, and they don’t want freedom but total control.

But when you drive a car, use an antibiotic, put on a pair of glasses, have a heart transplant and enjoy all the gains behind modern sanitation, realize these are gifts of Judeo/Christian civilization , not atheist socialism, or tribal animism. They didn’t come from screeching politicians, but from God himself. This might be a good time to check your perspective of this nation. It’s never been perfect, but because of its foundation its been the best. Might want to think twice about that before jumping on the rapidly sliding cultural bandwagon.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment