Why did SCOTUS suddenly change the interpretation of the “separation of church and state” in 1947?

Another faulty precedent from our blacked robed high priests (This is just one one of many poorly supported precedents used to force atheism into the position of a national religion)

It was not until 1947 that SCOTUS suddenly changed the interpretation of the first amendment and the meaning of “separation of church and state”. Here is a quote from that 1947 decision using the claim of Jefferson as being the main contributor to the constitution and first amendment, as precedent for their ruling;

“This Court has previously recognized that the provisions of the First Amendment, in the drafting and adoption of which … Jefferson played such (a) leading role.” Everson v. Bd. of Educ. 330 U.S. 1, 13 (194

But Jefferson was in Paris when it was written;

“I was in Europe when the Constitution was planned and never saw it till after it was established.” (1)

A simple fact unknown or ignored by many of today’s writers is that Jefferson did not participate in framing the Constitution. He was not even in America when it was framed; so how could he be considered a primary influence on it? And he was likewise out of the country when the First Amendment was written. As he openly acknowledged:

“On receiving it [the Constitution while in France], I wrote strongly to Mr. Madison, urging the want of provision for the freedom of religion, freedom of the press, trial by jury, habeas corpus, the substitution of militia for a standing army, and an express reservation to the States of all rights” (1)

Thomas Jefferson, The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Andrew A. Lipscomb, editor (Washington, DC: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association, 1904), Vol. X, 325, to Dr. Joseph Priestly on June 19, 1802.

Barton, David. The Jefferson Lies: Exposing the Myths You’ve Always Believed About Thomas Jefferson (Kindle Locations 6498-6500). WND Books. Kindle Edition.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

More on the Atheist Usurpation of the Christian Faith in the Public Arena-

Many doctored SCOTUS justices totally misunderstand and misinterpret Jefferson’s interpretation of the so-called separation of church and state; saying that because as a federal officer he never called for official days of prayer or fasting, they purport he felt this would violate the establishment clause. (snort) But he clearly said that was not true; he believed it was only wrong for the federal government to do so- not the state governments. And in fact he had often ordered fasts and prayer days as governor of Virginia. It was his view of federalism being held in check, not anything to do with the modern view of the establishment clause, that caused him to hold back on issuing official days of prayer;

For example, Supreme Court Justices William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall noted in Marsh v. Chambers that “Thomas Jefferson … during [his] respective terms as President, refused on Establishment Clause [First Amendment] grounds to declare national days of thanksgiving or fasting.”And Justice Anthony Kennedy similarly remarked in Allegheny v. ACLU: “In keeping with his strict views of the degree of separation mandated by the Establishment Clause, Thomas Jefferson declined to follow this tradition [of issuing national proclamations].”

But Jefferson himself said;
“I consider the government of the United States [i.e., the federal government] as interdicted [prohibited] by the Constitution from intermeddling with religious institutions, their doctrines, discipline, or exercises. (like the Anglicans had done in England)This results not only from the provision that “no law shall be made respecting the establishment or free exercise of religion” [the First Amendment], but from that also which reserves to the states the powers not delegated to the United States [the Tenth Amendment]. Certainly, no power to prescribe any religious exercise or to assume authority in religious discipline has been delegated to the general [federal] government. It must then rest with the states, as far as it can be in any human authority. But it is only proposed that I should recommend, not prescribe [require] a day of fasting and prayer…. I am aware that the practice of my predecessors may be quoted. But I have ever believed that the example of state executives [governors issuing prayer proclamations] led to the assumption of that authority by the general government [of the president issuing prayer proclamations] without due examination, which would have discovered that what might be a right in a state government was a violation of that right when assumed by another.” Thomas Jefferson, Memoir, Correspondence, and Miscellanies (1830), Vol. IV, 104, to Samuel Miller on January 23, 1808.

While Jefferson refused to issue a federal call for prayer, he had certainly done so as a state leader. In addition to his 1774 efforts with Virginia’s call for prayer, in 1779 as state governor he issued a statewide proclamation calling his fellow Virginians to prayer, asking them to give thanks “that He [God] hath diffused the glorious light of the Gospel…” He also authored bills that insisted on using the book of Leviticus for marriage standards. as well as other bills resting on clear biblical authority.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Jefferson and Separation of Christianity from Government

In 1779 when Jefferson became governor of Virginia, he introduced into the state legislature a package of bills including one on marriage;

“Marriages prohibited by the Levitical law shall be null; and persons marrying contrary to that prohibition and cohabitating as man and wife, convicted thereof in the General Court, shall be [fined] from time to time until they separate.”

Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Vol.1, 556,”A bill annulling the marriages prohibited by Leviticus Law and appointing the mode for solemnizing lawful marriage”

It seems pretty clear here, that the SCOTUS jurists didn’t find or use any precept from 250 years of American government or history, when they redefined the definition of marriage for us in 2015. Oh, well! As I’ve said, SCOTUS has bankrupted itself with wild decisions, made outside of their authority, based on imaginary precepts, poor jurisprudence, fear of cultural repercussions and faulty interpretations. We need to get a rope on them, throw them, tie their feet together and let the people vote again, and the legislators legislate.

The Supreme Court of the US has bipassed God given rights and has overstepped its authority more than once and invented rights that don’t exist to increase its reach. For example;

-The right to outlaw prayer in schools doesn’t exist – 1963

-The right to outlaw God and the Bible from the schools does not exist- 1941

-The right to make atheism the default state religion doesn’t exist – a result of above rulings- and Darwinian indoctrination –

-The right to keep slaves doesn’t exist (1857, Dred Scot SCOTUS ruling legalizing slavery)

-The right to kill prenatal infants does not exist – 1973-prenatal infanticide ruled as legal-

-The redefinition of marriage, ignoring 250 years of American precepts- 2015- SCOTUS found the right to redefine marriage for an entire nation-

Not a great track record- unless you’re a Karl Marx, Joseph Stalin or Engels or Trotsky fan.

“We must go to them with the propaganda of atheism, for only this defines the place of man in the universe”
Leon Trotsky, Russia

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment



When they say thinning is needed, they’re admitting we need to return to more logging AND grazing. And it’s not just fires that cause damage when we don’t log and graze. What they don’t want to tell you is they now know logging and grazing help the land sequester carbon, which they blame for “Climate Change” Any idea how much carbon goes up when it burns? Massive carbon is added to atmosphere. So uncontrolled burning is never good. They have destroyed the forest in 20 years and lost billions of dollars doing it. And yet you think they understand and can control the climate? This is what happens when pagan atheist/pantheism takes over a government- which then adopts their forest management practices to it- Have we learned yet?

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Scumbag? Why CNN is reduced to name calling

Why does the left continuously rely on name calling? Because if they could they would attack his policies, but they can’t do that without looking like idiots. “Scumbag”?
– Tore down the biggest government created crisis scam in history, the global warming money suck and power grab; and the weather didn’t change.
– Boldy placed our Israeli embassy in Jerusalem, something too straightforward and respectful of the Jewish nations right to exist, for any other blathering, politically gaming president. He did it.
-Called North Korea’s bluff, at least enough to establish a relationship again between the two Korea’s. No previous president came close.
-In 6 months he kicked ISIS’s ass, and changed the rules of engagement which saved American lives and allowed us to win. Obama created ISIS.
-He stripped away thousands of Obama era business regulations that were killing the economy and he turned the economy around, helping entrepreneurs and workers. All Obama could say is, “Duhhhhh. ”
-He placed a new head in the EPA who took the reins away from the hyper urban environmentalists who were having Cowboys shot, cows kicked off the land and more tortoises moved in (just for starters) Maybe we can log again?
-He has openly attacked the UN world organization for its flagrant bias against the one Jewish nation and its horrific wasteful spending. No other president had the guts.
-And these are just a few of the things he has done that no other president would have had the steel to do, they don’t even come close. Have a nice day.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Wait! Which President is Traitorous?

Wait! Which president was actually traitorous?

Which president joined the UN in stabbing Israel in the back? Which president gave pallets of money to Iran while they chanted “Death to America!”? Which president was caught on mic saying he would be more flexible for Russia after the election? Which president took down the missle defense being built to protect Europe from Russia? Which president’s Secretary of State made millions off the Russian uranium sale? Which president used invisible ink when drawing red lines in Syria? Whch president used the IRS to audit his political enemies? Which president did nothing about the bullying North Korean dictator? Which president’s BLM attacked cows and cowboys in the West? Which president never held a normal job or ran a business in his life? Which president bent over backwards trying to prove he was black by encouraging division and excusing attacks on police officers? Under which president was an opposition candidate spied on in an attempt to alter an election? Which president aligned himself with a known terrorist group, the Muslim Brotherhood? Which president helped create ISIS by pulling American troops out of Iraq prematurely? Which president could not be reached and unfairly blamed a video maker during the attack on an understaffed embassy in Ben Ghazi? So which president and party backing him are actually treasonous and traitorous?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

SCOTUS is not really the Supreme Court

Force bakers to approve of same- sex weddings? Seriously? Fortunately they didn’t go there yet, but if they do, let me assure you, laws, including moral laws do not come from man, but from an immutable pre and self existent God; unless you believe that both keeping slaves and killing babies was and is morally acceptable behavior. The so called supreme court does not make or take human rights, they can only recognize those rights and morals from God that already exist. Read your Declaration of Independence. And this government cannot legally enforce atheist doctrines on it’s people even though it has illegally forced atheist doctrine on our schools. What precedent would they use to enforce approval and acceptance of homosexuality? Where would they go for precedence? Sodom and Gomorrah? Right. Don’t be intimidated. Read this SCOTUS decision recognizing that Christian morality underlays our laws;
“The organization of a community for the spread and practice of polygamy is . . . .
contrary to the spirit of Christianity and of the civilization which Christianity has produced in the Western world. ”
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States 136 U.S. 1, 49 (1890
Have a great day.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment