Quote of the Week

“Isn’t it strange when a culture outlaws leg-hold traps but legalizes the sale of baby parts?”
Would-be Trapper

One important point I want to make on this post; When I condemn the practice of abortion, I am in no way condemning the women who have been coerced into abortion or talked themselves into the act; how could I? How could I condemn them for having been born into a culture where sex is cheap and has no connection to the responsibility of marriage, or child rearing? Where the teaching of the atheist creation story thru out the government school systems has justified the cheapening of human life- to less than the level of mere animals? Just like the southern democrats that bought and bred black slaves on their plantations, and were born into a slave keeping society that reduced the humanity of the blacks to subhuman, and thus had inoculated themselves to the trade. But as the declaration of independence clearly states; all human beings have inalienable rights that exist outside of human government- and all humans are stamped with God’s image. Which is why Moses first recognized the humanity of slaves and why the Christian nations were the first to abolish the practice, along with abortion, starting as far back as 800 AD in Europe. It would be sheer hypocrisy for someone living in an abortion inoculated society to condemn someone born into a slave-keeping society. But I condemn the act of abortion for what it is. An attack on human life; an attack on the most innocent and defenseless of humans; an attack on the very morals this nation was founded on. Have a good day

Advertisements
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Did Obama as president imply that the 1857 SCOTUS law supporting slavery was valid?

Better start re-erecting those downed Robert E. Lee statues! According to then pres. Barack Obama, the argument of privacy used to support slavery in the 1857 supreme court Dred Scot decision, was valid!

As President, Obama, the “constitutional lawyer” reaffirmed the women’s constitutional right to…privacy?
Ummm, that is, the imagined constitutional right to KILL her baby.
In a speech to Planned Parenthood he said, ” “Forty years after the Supreme Court affirmed a woman’s constitutional right to privacy, including the right to choose, we shouldn’t have to remind people that when it comes to a woman’s health, no politician should get to decide what’s best for you,”
Apparently he is referring to the Roe vs Wade argument quoted here;
“A slave is the property of the master and the Constitution has “provided for the protection of private property against the encroachments of the Government.” Dred Scott case of 1857
Oh! I’m sorry! That’s the supreme court argument using the right of privacy to support keeping slaves! so embarrassing, sorry! Here is the Roe vs Wade argument;
Roe vs. Wade decreed;
“This right of privacy… is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.” (terminate her pregnancy, as in, KILL her baby) 1973
So actually, the SCOTUS law supporting slavery, was valid? Our first black president, a self confessed constitutional lawyer, apparently thinks so…apparently both the slave and baby, though genuine human beings, have no God given rights, since both have been deemed, “private property”, thus their possesors are protected by the right to privacy.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Quote of the Week

The Northwest Ordinance, July 13, 1787
Article III.
“Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged. The utmost good faith shall always be observed towards the Indians; their lands and property shall never be taken from them without their consent; and, in their property, rights, and liberty, they shall never be invaded or disturbed, unless in just and lawful wars authorized by Congress; but laws founded in justice and humanity, shall from time to time be made for preventing wrongs being done to them, and for preserving peace and friendship with them.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What About that Horrid White Race?

Why does the left keep attacking the Caucasian race, so that even the “white people” are taught to feel ashamed or guilty of being white? (I’m talking in racist terms because that’s what it seems to be all about these days) So, is the white race the worst, and most evil? Well, what Barack Obama in his book, and college campuses keep using as proof of this horridness, is that we colonized the majority of the world. But did we colonize the world because we were so evil, or because we had the technology?

No offense but if African or Indian canoes could have crossed the Atlantic or cruised up north from Africa, they would have. But even if they could have, if they had landed in Western European shores any time after the 13th century, they would have been blown out the water by cannon, musket and crossbow fire. Technology had exploded in Europe, they were light years ahead of the rest of the world.

Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not trying to defend the white race, that’s not my tact here. To me it’s so unmanly and unproductive to whine about how hard your ethnic group has had it, no matter how popular that is today, (if anyone deserves an exception, it would have to be the Jewish) and really, ungodly because you’re blaming Providence.

But the Democratic party has chosen atheism, an unrealistic world view, to base all their premises. God is not allowed into political thought because that would be a violation of the left’s interpretation of the establishment clause. But where did these horrible Europeans get their technology? Was it their skin color? Nope. Just like the Jewish people were light years ahead of all other cultures, in their sanitation, and faith in only one god, so the western Europeans on accepting the Jewish God, exploded ahead of other nations in technology.

Now this is all very un-leftwing, but this is exactly why the existing Democratic party is attacking the founders of our nation, and it’s constitution. Our constitution is not an atheist or socialist based document. Our founders pointed back to God and said true, inalienable rights come from him only and governments are formed for the express purpose of defending those rights.

The left screams against slavery but slavery was said to be wrong by Abraham Lincoln and the founders because it violated those inalienable rights. Just like abortion, which the modern Democratic party defends with a vengeance. The democratic party doesn’t want to compete with God , so they have been trying for 60 years to remove even the mention of him from the schools and political scene, and quite successfully. They’ll push racial division, class warfare, gender warfare, anything to keep your eyes off the God given basis of the Constitution, and the God behind it. They want the government to be god and the construer of all rights, and they don’t want freedom but total control.

But when you drive a car, use an antibiotic, put on a pair of glasses, have a heart transplant and enjoy all the gains behind modern sanitation, realize these are gifts of Judeo/Christian civilization , not atheist socialism, or tribal animism. They didn’t come from screeching politicians, but from God himself. This might be a good time to check your perspective of this nation. It’s never been perfect, but because of its foundation its been the best. Might want to think twice about that before jumping on the rapidly sliding cultural bandwagon.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Pres. Obama and his “who we are” speeches

President Obama and his “who we are” speeches
It’s not the government’s job to tell us “who we are” or what we are. Our founders didn’t come to this nation so they could be fed by the government, be given jobs by the government, or have every basic need and security provided by the government. And definitely not to be told who they were. They came to America so they could decide “who they are”, or what they believe, and to let their consciences decide what right and wrong are according to their freely chosen beliefs. They wanted no king or president, like the bullying, self righteous president Obama, to force his personal political, religious, and moral views on themselves. No thank you. This government was founded for one reason only, and that was to protect the basic inalienable liberties given to mankind by the Creator. One of those is the freedom to decide who you are, whether government officials like it or not. We want freedom, which breeds diversity, and the freedom to protect that diversity. States can be different, counties can be independent and differ from other counties. Enforced government control where people are afraid to dissent from an over-stepping federal government that insists on telling you who you are, is polar opposite from the intentions of the founders. The former president’s over-used terminology, was a thinly disguised form of bullying, and little else. And his agenda was not to protect the varying beliefs that make up America, or respect the founding beliefs of America, but to impose his tired old academic version of left wing atheist socialism and it’s 60s version of sexual morality on everyone else- so he could dictate “who we are”. Whether we like it, or not. But, Mr. Obama; we prefer to tell the government who we are; not vice versa, and our feisty forefathers would have whole heartedly agreed.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Quote of the Week-

“No People can be bound to acknowledge and adore the invisible hand, which conducts the Affairs of men more than the People of the United States”
George Washington, first inaugural speech, April 30, 1789

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why did SCOTUS appeal to pagan Rome?

Compare the Declaration of independence on how the right to life is established; and then look at the arguments used by both the proslavery decision and pro-abortion decisions passed by SCOTUS;

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, ”
There is no right to kill innocent human beings without due process in the constitution. The very foundation of the constitution has been violated. It’s not a pagan atheist based document. Pagans have always killed their babies and others for many reasons.

n the Dred Scott case of 1857;

“…that unfortunate race…had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order [and] they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.”

And Roe vs. Wade;

“…abortion was practiced in Greek times as well as in the Roman Era…. Greek and Roman law afforded little protection to the unborn.”
Again, we are not Romans, they were pagan pantheists. Why did SCOTUS ignore our constitution, and go to Rome?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment