President Obama and his “who we are” speeches
It’s not the government’s job to tell us “who we are” or what we are. Our founders didn’t come to this nation so they could be fed by the government, be given jobs by the government, or have every basic need and security provided by the government. And definitely not to be told who they were. They came to America so they could decide “who they are”, or what they believe, and to let their consciences decide what right and wrong are according to their freely chosen beliefs. They wanted no king or president, like the bullying, self righteous president Obama, to force his personal political, religious, and moral views on themselves. No thank you. This government was founded for one reason only, and that was to protect the basic inalienable liberties given to mankind by the Creator. One of those is the freedom to decide who you are, whether government officials like it or not. We want freedom, which breeds diversity, and the freedom to protect that diversity. States can be different, counties can be independent and differ from other counties. Enforced government control where people are afraid to dissent from an over-stepping federal government that insists on telling you who you are, is polar opposite from the intentions of the founders. The former president’s over-used terminology, was a thinly disguised form of bullying, and little else. And his agenda was not to protect the varying beliefs that make up America, or respect the founding beliefs of America, but to impose his tired old academic version of left wing atheist socialism and it’s 60s version of sexual morality on everyone else- so he could dictate “who we are”. Whether we like it, or not. But, Mr. Obama; we prefer to tell the government who we are; not vice versa, and our feisty forefathers would have whole heartedly agreed.
“No People can be bound to acknowledge and adore the invisible hand, which conducts the Affairs of men more than the People of the United States”
George Washington, first inaugural speech, April 30, 1789
Compare the Declaration of independence on how the right to life is established; and then look at the arguments used by both the proslavery decision and pro-abortion decisions passed by SCOTUS;
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, ”
There is no right to kill innocent human beings without due process in the constitution. The very foundation of the constitution has been violated. It’s not a pagan atheist based document. Pagans have always killed their babies and others for many reasons.
n the Dred Scott case of 1857;
“…that unfortunate race…had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order [and] they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.”
And Roe vs. Wade;
“…abortion was practiced in Greek times as well as in the Roman Era…. Greek and Roman law afforded little protection to the unborn.”
Again, we are not Romans, they were pagan pantheists. Why did SCOTUS ignore our constitution, and go to Rome?
“All these sham reformers, in the name of a new morality, preach the old, old vice and self-indulgence which rotted out first the moral fiber and then even the external greatness of Greece and Rome.”
Teddy Roosevelt, The Foes of Our Own Household, 1917, p 112
Comparing the Democratic party’s candidate’s world view and policies to Adolph Hitler might seem offensive – but Hitler, like Stalin and Mao, was driven by an evolutionary world view. Which is why Germany and Russia were the first Western nations to strip infants of their right to life. Basically we fought a war against Hitler, and then in the sixties adopted his worldview. He also moved quickly to strip the people of their arms and then moved against the church. The Nuremberg trial documents his moves, often quite sneaky, but relentless. Hitler forced his evolutionary pagan worldview on Germany- we adopted it after a hippy hedonistic revival. The Democratic party is the party lending the strongest support for that view. You support that party, you’re supporting the devaluing of human life, the enforced teaching of evolution in public school and the slaughter of infants. And a relentless attack on Christian ethics and morals. It’s that simple.
How much of a role does carbon play in weather change? Is carbon in the atmosphere forcing dramatic warming or has it been historically a natural result of warming?
Carbon build up in the atmosphere follows warming periods in weather interpretations taken from the ice core- carbon doesn’t precede or cause warming but appears to be a product of weather change
I don’t want to be too hard on my “man caused climate catastrophist” friends, because I know it’s a closely held religious view,(one that has removed God from the picture or gives him little consequence) and has some aspects which are quite convenient to human nature. You can watch porn all day, cheat on your taxes, and endorse the killing of unborn infants at a political level, and still not violate any religious standard. Not bad. But not necessarily scientific. One of the interesting aspects of the interpretation of weather in the ice cores, and not one I plan to major on, but still of interest, is the relation of warning trends to carbon build up as it’s found in the cores. Does Carbon cause weather to warm or is carbon build up a result of warming climates? Well….that’s not really a tough argument to solve, because in the ice core samples interpreted by scientists, carbon build up follows climate warming- it doesn’t precede it. Some reports estimate it follows by 800 or more years, and some say the lag is only 400 or so years. I think it’s probably much less as I don’t think the ice sheets are that old. But what we do know, is the carbon does follow the warming, not vice versa. Faced with this data, articles defending the faith of carbon caused warming go into long discussions of mathematical calculations on how to measure man caused carbon input, its ability to effect warming, or oceanic input etc. But at the end of the rabbit trails we end up with the fact that in the historical weather reading from the ice cores- warm weather periods were not a product of carbon build up; carbon build up was the result of warmer weather. This would help explain why there was no temperature rise from 1940 to 1970, a period when man produced carbon entered the atmosphere at one of its highest rates. Kind of would of been better for climate catastrophists if the reverse was true. This isn’t to say carbon doesn’t play a role in warming- But it’s not the driving force of weather change people would like it to be. Man is a religious creature by nature, and particularly when that religion puts so few moral demands on him. And when that belief is handy politically, it’s very hard to part with.
This IS our country. We built this government, it didn’t build us.
In every socialist (evolutionary based) movement including the present one under Obama and Hillary and the like- they will tell you ” You didn’t build this!”, “It not your country!” Etc., and they’ll despise the Christian foundation and pretend it doesn’t exist or that you have no right to it. They do this because they know your basic rights don’t come from government and they want to convince you otherwise. They want their government to be your god. Every dictator since Darwin’s day has been the same. They’ll mock the bible and say it can’t be the basis for government. Stalin, Marx, Obama, Mao, same beliefs, same approach. But they’re wrong, and their lies are based on an evolutionary fairy tale, and they melt away in the face of the fossil record, the deleterious effects of mutation and they have failed every prediction they ever made. We do have a right to this nation and to our basic human liberties- listen to founder John Adams; ““Be it remembered that liberty must at all hazards be supported. We have a right to it, derived from our Maker. But if not, our fathers have earned and bought it for us at the expense of their ease, their estates, their pleasures and their blood…Let it be known that British liberties are not the grants of princes or parliaments …that many of our rights are inherent and essential…established even before Parliament existed…Let us recollect and impress upon our souls the view and ends of our immediate forefathers..(the Puritans), Their amazing fortitude, their bitter sufferings…the civil and religious principles that…constantly supplied them and carried them through all hardships with patience and resignation..which conquered all discouragements.” John Adams
A vote for the left is a vote directly for saline acid bath abortion and physical dissection of the most innocent of human beings and continued promotion of the free sex at all costs 1960s lifestyle. Not to mention a few other problems.
The candidates running for office represent parties, and those parties have histories; they supported judges for SCOTUS who stood for major decisions, the Dred Scot decision legalizing slavery, for example; that was the democrats. They supported Roe vs Wade, that was and is supported by democratic judge picks. Even the kicking the 5 civilized tribes off their land- a decision that Davy Crockett fought against tooth and nail, was largely the actions of the Democratic party. So these two candidates still represent two different parties, with histories of separate values. The Democratic party has adopted and promoted the values of the 60’s moral implosion for over 50 years. Free sex, abortion, the anti-family and anti-biblical feminist movement. They promoted the welfare program to manipulate the black vote and virtually destroyed the black family structure. They have promoted an anti-American and anti -Christian spirit while soft peddling Islam and atheism and socialism. They have been the leaders in going after the second amendment, stripping us of our arms. The Republican party has not been consistent in its support of traditional (Christian) values, the Democratic party has been consistent in attacking them. Who knows, Trump may be the anti-christ- but I know for sure what the Democratic left will do. And you’re not going to vote? Pshaw.