Why did Obama try to Convince us we are no Longer a Christian Nation?

Why did ex-president Obama try and convince us that we are no longer a Christian nation? Why did the government outlaw prayer in 1963 and mandate the same year (without vote) that the atheist theory of origins (evolution) be taught exclusively and very onesidedly in the public school system? Why has the federally funded college system mandated acceptance of gender and sexual teaching that violates the Christian values that protected us for 2000 years? Why? Because they want to remove God from your conscience. And why do they want to do that? Because when they remove God, they at the same time remove the idea of pre-existing inalienable rights from that God, rights that exist outside of government and don’t depend on government. Then, the government becomes god, and giver and taker of basic rights and you become its fodder. Little men like Obama become like Roman emperors or Marxist dictators, and you their sheep for slaughter. Our government was formed by firm Christian men and women famous for their strong faith in a supernatural Creator; and they named him as the foundation of their government. See the excerpt below, they mention natural law; but also clearly connect that law to the God of nature, the Creator from whom all things flow;

“When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,” Declaration of Independence 1775

In short- no God; no inalienable rights, no power above government; government becomes our god and constitutions aren’t there to protect pre-existing rights, they only exist to outline the governments dictates.

Advertisements
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Cromwell Used Arms to Overthrow the Tyranny of Charles the First; Have Governments quit going Rogue?

When Cromwell overthrew king Charles, he did so by raising an army in Cornwall, in order to save religious liberties and save the parliament from becoming a mere tool of the king. Just because that would be difficult to do today, doesn’t necessarily mean we should surrender our arms to the government, because a group of high school students manipulated by CNN want a day off from school. Governments go rogue. And a government which has removed the right to life from an entire class of humans, even though they still bear the image of God, because they are defenseless and can’t vote, is already in violation of our theistic based constitution (God given rights to life and liberty are the basis and at the core of our government and do not have to be listed in the constitution to be recognized). And when they push a failed atheistic version of scientific origins that was used by the Marxists and fascists to promote tyranny in Germany, Russia and Red China, in the public school system, they may be just a little bit rogue…

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Question of the Week

If our government was formed to recognize god given inalienable rights that exist apart from man’s government, rights that were violated by both the 1857 SCOTUS proslavery decision and the 1973 proabortion SCOTUS decision; why has this government endorsed the indoctrination of Darwin’s theory in the public school system since 1963? Not only has the theory failed every one of it’s predictions, it was formed to attack the very basis our government was formed to protect.

“Lyell is most firmly convinced that he has shaken the faith in the Deluge far more efficiently by never having said a word against the Bible than if he had acted otherwise.” Darwin went on to say, “I have read lately’ Morley’s Life of Voltaire’, he insists that direct attacks on Christianity…produce little permanent effect: real good seems only to follow the slow and silent attacks” Charles Darwin
Himmelfarb, Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution, 1967, p. 387

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ya think it might be wise to elect officials who recognize the reason our government was founded, as declared in the Declaration of Independence?

“Since the signing of the Declaration of Independence 241 years ago, America always affirmed that liberty comes from our creator,” Trump declared. “Our rights are given to us by God and no earthly force can ever take those rights away.” Donald Trump

He’s right, and it’s nice to hear it affirmed by a seated president. The Declaration of Independence makes it clear that our government was formed to recognize and protect those rights. Those rights pre-existed the formation of our government and are not dependent on this government; but they were the basis for its foundation. Those inalienable rights do not have to be repeated in the constitution, or affirmed by robed supreme court judges to exist. The constitution does not exist to list all the rights of man, and those not listed rest with the states. When the supreme court violated the slaves right to freedom in 1857, and violated prenatal infants right to life in 1973, it did so by recognizing the right to privacy and private property that do not appear in the constitution, but exist as prenumbral rights, rights that exist outside of the constitution. They then used these prenumbral rights, to remove the God given rights to life and liberty clearly listed in the Declaration of Independence. Ya think it might be wise to elect officials who recognize the reason our government was founded, as declared in the Declaration of Independence?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Democratic View of the Constitution turns it into a Criminally Useful Document

Two times a sitting president (Barack Obama) abused the purpose of federal agencies, and violated their non-partisan obligation, to manipulate a presidential election. In 2012 he pulled it off, in 2016, he failed. But…why should anyone who interprets the constitution from an evolutionary atheist view care? Which is why the democrats don’t care. Atheism and Darwinism provide no inalienable rights or universal morals; except; only the strong (or sneakiest) will survive.

“House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes also released a statement Saturday, reiterating his position that the FBI spied on an American citizen through the use of an opposing party’s “political dirt” and that “the FISA court was misled about Mr. Page’s past interactions with the FBI.”
Nunes’ statement also said, “It defies belief that the Department of Justice and FBI failed to provide information to a secret court that they had provided to an open federal court regarding their past interactions with Mr. Page.” Daily Caller

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Chapter Two;  What Does Paul mean by Apostasy in 2nd Thessalonians? Excerpt from the Apostasia

Chapter Two

 What Does Paul mean by Apostasy in 2nd Thessalonians?

 How would we define apostasy from what Paul tells us in the context of his second letter to the Thessalonians? As the concordances we looked at in the previous chapter indicate, the apostasy is a time of falling away, of a great deflection, a divorce from the truth of God “Once and for all delivered to the saints” Jude 3.

The Church Age has existed for over two thousand years now, and its history has for the most part been well documented by hundreds of historians and leaders from days’ past. That the church has gone through many periods of revival and devival, apostasies, as well as periods of stagnation is well known. However, there is a tendency with some people to see the last days in every event and every period of history and we want to avoid reading too much into any one circumstance or set of circumstances.

And yet on the other hand there is an opposite tendency on the part of many others to adopt an “Ever since our fathers died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation” attitude towards church history in general and our present period. On an extremely short scale, the last seventy years, I think the evangelical church has gone from perhaps an over emphasis on the Lord’s imminent return since the re-establishment of the Jewish people in Israel, to an attitude among many of the Christian young people today of; “everything continues as it has since the beginning of creation,’ 2 Peter 3:4. The context of Second Peter is that just such a lax attitude towards the second coming would dominate before His return. However, because the time scale is so short I am not offering that as one of the evidences of our being in the Apostasia.

The point needs to be made that all eras and periods of church history have not been the same.  Paul the Apostle as well as the Apostle Peter definitely earmarked a certain period of history that would be marked by an increasingly apostate church, a church that would not only fail to have much effect on the surrounding culture, but would instead conform itself to meet the standards of an alarmingly aggressive apostate and pagan society.

This period of apostasy wouldn’t apply so much to the areas of the world where the gospel is still spreading, places where there either never was or hasn’t been a real church presence for a long period of time. For this reason, China, India and many parts of Africa would not have to be included in a survey of apostasy in the church. The term “apostasy” is a falling away, a turning away from something once widely held and taught.

Historically, many would call the turning away from biblical truth in the beginning of the medieval ages a type of apostasy and they would be accurate. However, the areas of the world which have been dominated by the church and the Christian faith for centuries, particularly the European nations and their colonies did go through a reformation which centered the church back on the Scriptures again. The Catholic Church also participated in the reform in many ways, and both continued to have a strong influence on their respective societies for centuries afterwards.

Basic truths and ethical mores remained the same for over a millennium, whether you were a catholic or protestant, a peasant or of the nobility. While the Catholic might have placed the pope and the catholic hierarchy over the Word of God and its interpretation, no one doubted that the Bible was indeed, the word of God. No one questioned its authenticity or authority, even though they may have argued over its interpretation. Certain fundamental beliefs were held to be true by all, catholic or protestant.

 By fundamentals I simply mean an English protestant would have shared many of the fundamental truths of the faith that any Cape Breton catholic would have believed 500 years ago. The Scriptures were the authoritative words of God and our guide for life and religion. The universe was created ex-nihilo by a triune God; Jesus Christ was God and man, both would have accepted an historical 6 day creation; Adam made from dust, Eve from his side; they would have understood an initially good creation marred by a literal fall and curse, meaning no death before sin; they would have shared a common faith in a physical death and resurrection and ultimate return of the Jewish Messiah; a physical heaven for the saved and physical and eternal hell for the lost. All these basic beliefs were held in common throughout most of Christendom, not just for a few decades, but for centuries.

Differences of emphasis, teaching, church structure, and doctrine were wide spread, but for the most part the basics of the historical Christian faith were firmly held. For almost two thousand years, this was the case.

Fundamental beliefs about morality also pervaded throughout Christendom. Divorce was almost unheard of, sex before marriage was considered the sin of fornication, infanticide and pre-natal infanticide were made illegal everywhere, whether you lived in a catholic or protestant region of the world. Modesty was held to be the standard that both men and women should follow, not something to be mocked or looked down upon. Open displays of sexuality were not condoned nor considered healthy for society in general. Sexually transmitted diseases were not a serious problem for centuries. Homosexual behavior was largely kept out of view and there were no major plagues associated with either homosexual or heterosexual promiscuity.

However, Paul wrote of a time when these things would no longer be so. A time when the Church and Christian society would “fall away” from these standards and truths. The verses in context of Second Thessalonians read;

“Now we request you, brethren, with regard to the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together to Him, that you not be quickly shaken from your composure or be disturbed either by a spirit or a message or a letter as if from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come. Let no one in any way deceive you, for it will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, displaying himself as being God.  Do you not remember that while I was still with you, I was telling you these things?  And you know what restrains him now, so that in his time he will be revealed. For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now restrains will do so until he is taken out of the way. Then that lawless one will be revealed whom the Lord will slay with the breath of His mouth and bring to an end by the appearance of His coming; that is, the one whose coming is in accord with the activity of Satan, with all power and signs and false wonders, and with all the deception of wickedness for those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth so as to be saved. For this reason God will send upon them a deluding influence so that they will believe what is false, in order that they all may be judged who did not believe the truth, but took pleasure in wickedness.”

 One thing is certain as far as I am concerned, the “man of lawlessness” has not been revealed and he is of key importance in these scriptures. None the less, as Paul said, even in his day the mystery of lawlessness was working, and he clearly indicates a falling away would come and that at that time Christian society would reach a point where they preferred to believe a lie, over the truth. Because of this total disregard for even the concept of truth, God would then send them a delusion.

Romans chapter one talks of the general tendency of mankind to apostasy in a very clear and definable manner. Starting at verse 18 and continuing through verse 32, Paul writes;

“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened.  Professing to be wise, they became fools and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man–and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.  Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.”

Man has an affinity for turning his worship towards the created earth and away from the earth’s Creator. He goes on to say that in such times of apostasy God would allow men and women to fall away from his truths because they preferred to believe a lie, and that homosexual behavior would increase among them, in both sexes. God allows this because;

“And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting;”

 “For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.”

 Many today, including professing Christians, claim they don’t find the bible a meaningful source of connection to the real world. Yet few could deny that an unprecedented outbreak of sexual promiscuity exploded on the scene in both Europe and America following the 1960’s. With its emphasis on free sex without boundaries and the increasingly enforced acceptance of homosexual behavior, it does seem to resemble Paul’s description of apostasy found in Romans chapter one. Nor does the AID’s epidemic seem wholly incongruous with the “receiving the penalty within themselves of the error that was due,” found in the first chapter of Romans.  AID’s was not the only sexually transmitted disease arriving on the scene by any means with Herpes and a couple of dozen other viruses becoming widespread at that time.

So, I think most would be willing to admit that the Christian societies of the old world at least appear to have entered into a time of apostasy. But are there any symptoms or evidences that we may be in “the” Apostasy, the period of time that sets the stage for the revealing of the anti-Christ and the return of the Lord that Paul wrote about in Second Thessalonians?

I think there are some unique and compelling evidences and will list some of them in the next chapter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Quote of the Week; Noah Webster

Noah Webster; revolutionary war soldier, judge, educator, called “the school master to America”

“The religion which has introduced civil liberty is the religion of Christ and His apostles… This is genuine Christianity and to this we owe our free constitutions of government”
Noah Webster, History of the United States (New Haven: Durrie and Peck, 1832), p. 300

This was no wild conjecture; Protestant Christianity put everyone; Pope and Pastor, Prince and King, under the authority of scripture; nobody was above the word of God. This brought about a new sense of equality from tenant farmer to Duke, from woodcutter to legislator; and it brought about a common ground for understanding right and wrong. That was one of the dynamics behind the Magna Carta; and when the Puritans overthrew the King of England to protect Parliament and religious liberty; Oliver Cromwell deliberately applied his and their belief that, as is written on his gravestone; Christ not man, is King. The only thing that atheism can bring about is frightened masses and all powerful governments. But, on the grounds of a scientific idea so poor it cannot even qualify as a theory, we’ve thrown away our freedoms hard won from our Christian heritage for a pile of academic gobshakes, called atheism. Surely fallen man is running from God.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments